From kde-panel-devel  Sun May 26 18:41:00 2013
From: Thomas Pfeiffer <colomar () autistici ! org>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:41:00 +0000
To: kde-panel-devel
Subject: Re: Switches around the world and broken metaphors [Was: Battery Monitor revamp]
Message-Id: <1761598.o6ociVIt9e () linux ! fritz ! box>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-panel-devel&m=136959367724600

On Sunday 26 May 2013 18:35:20 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > So if ambiguity is the only reason against using switches on Desktop, we
> > should use them.
> 
> At least for me there is another reason: given the way how the switch
> component is designed (again no matter which one) I am inclined to drag it
> from left to right. I don't try to click, I have to drag. There is no visual
> hint that clicking would adjust the state. It doesn't look like a clickable
> button. This makes the component really difficult to use. While on a touch
> screen it's much easier to use than a check box.

Absolutely. This is what I meant by 
"One reason is surely that flicking a switch on a touch screen, though not 
"natural" at all because of the lack of haptical feedback, is much closer to 
reality than flicking a switch by clicking it with a mouse." way further down 
in my mail ;)

> Now I could learn to click (so far I failed to do so), but I can think of
> many people who would no longer be able to learn this.

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel