[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla
From:       Rolf Eike Beer <kde () opensource ! sf-tec ! de>
Date:       2013-05-25 12:16:21
Message-ID: 1408529.h4h4mnlfak () eto
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Samstag 25 Mai 2013, 10:19:37 schrieb Jekyll Wu:

> Well, DrKonqi uses Product.get API to fetch product information from
> bugs.kde.org, including all available versions (either active or disabled).
> But that is not the point of those "escaped" reports which shouldn't be
> accepted. Even if DrKonqi doesn't know any version information on
> bugs.kde.org, when it sends a request against some disabled version,
> bugs.kde.org (since upgrading to bugzilla 4.2.5) should detect and reject
> the request, then send back a error message to drkonqi, like the screenshot
> in https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=78600&action=edit.
> 
> Now this expected rejecting behavior works for versions like "4.9.0" or
> "4.10.60" (no whitespace), but not for "4.8.5 (4.8.5)" (containing
> whitespace). It might be that DrKonqi sends version containing whitespace
> in a wrong way, or that bugzilla deals with version containing white space
> in a wrong way. But since Drknonqi also sends distribution information
> (like "Ubuntu Packages") containing whitespace in the same way and bugzilla
> deals with that correctly, I'm inclined to think something goes wrong in
> bugzilla when dealing with versions.

Maybe it's not the space, but (). Maybe it is used as regex or something?

Eike
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]