[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: Notifications-future, a recap
From:       Sune Vuorela <nospam () vuorela ! dk>
Date:       2012-09-20 19:42:32
Message-ID: slrnk5msd9.aom.nospam () sshway ! ssh ! pusling ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2012-09-17, Dario Freddi <drf54321@gmail.com> wrote:
> It really depends on what you want to achieve. If your goal is just
> cleaning up the API and implementing the existing standard it might
> work out, but for sure it won't just cut it for what I proposed, where

Why won't the existing (as in the fdo/galago spec) api cut it to ensure
we also play well with others (in both directions) ?

Really. All I read is complexity for teh sake of complexity, trying
to build walled gardens for the sake of building walled gardens and
complicating deployment for the sake of complicating deployment.
And I don't think that's neither modern, slick nor futureproof.

/Sune

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]