From kde-panel-devel  Sun May 22 13:33:29 2011
From: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <mgraesslin () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 13:33:29 +0000
To: kde-panel-devel
Subject: Re: Re: Feature Freeze in place - What about Integration repo?
Message-Id: <3026260.Hy0pzAZarx () martin-desktop>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-panel-devel&m=130607137332578
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0456851718=="


--===============0456851718==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1578425.XR0fk4OpiP"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


--nextPart1578425.XR0fk4OpiP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:12:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday, May 15, 2011 19:34:10 Martin Gr=E4=DFlin wrote:
> > as we all know the hard feature freeze is in place since somewhen l=
ast week.
> > So we are supposed to fix bugs and no longer work on features. But =
we all
> > want to continue hacking. At Tokamak we wanted to setup an integrat=
ion
> > repository and I think now is the timepoint to get this started.
>=20
> agreed.
>=20
> > I just pushed current origin/master into my personal clone and if w=
e don't
> > find something else, I would propose my clone as the integration re=
pository
> > for kde-workspace.
>=20
> looking at the link you provided here:
>=20
> > http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Git/Feature_Developme=
nt_Workfl
> > ow
>=20
> there's already an integration clone made by dafre. i don't particula=
rly care=20
> _who_ hosts it, but confusion right at the start as to which repo to =
use is=20
> not a great start ;)
>=20
> to prevent confusion and since it really doesn't matter which way we =
go as=20
> long as we have a decision, i'd like for Dario to speak up in this th=
read. if=20
> he is willing to commit to continuing this experiment, then i'd like =
to stick=20
> with that path for continuity's sake.
any results on it?
>=20
> if not, then let's go for plan B, change that wiki page and start usi=
ng your=20
> (Martin's) clone.
A plan C could be to use a dedicated branch in the main repository. It =
would circumvent the=20
issue that we need sysadmin support when merging back to master.

I think we should communicate our needs to sysadmin (e.g. team reposito=
ry which we get=20
commit mails, etc.).

Cheers
Martin
--nextPart1578425.XR0fk4OpiP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk3ZEKkACgkQqVXwidMiVrq5xACgkZpcSwLJDuuitVFOsB0czCjG
9QsAoI3GRFLqwx8sjYiLiIR/UVs0Ke52
=DFOS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1578425.XR0fk4OpiP--


--===============0456851718==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

--===============0456851718==--