[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: First try on Git repo for kdebase-workspace
From:       Ben Cooksley <bcooksley () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-12-14 0:15:39
Message-ID: AANLkTik-g7XnB40zbD929=m3RUF6iNEdP7imfw_iiR=2 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:10 PM, John Layt <johnlayt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 13 December 2010 23:56:56 Alex Fiestas wrote:
>> On 12/14/2010 12:30 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
>> > Dunno if dropping 'kde' makes sense. Dropping the 'base' makes sense,
>> > since its mostly a historical artifact. But workspace is KDE's
>> > workspace under past and present marketing schemes, so it makes sense.
>> >
>> > Plasma-workspace might be ok as well, even with Aaron's point. Just
>> > "workspace" seems way too generic. Remember this is the name the
>> > tarball would get, probably the name (new) distros would give the
>> > package as well...
>>
>> Well, it is already under the KDE git repository so in theory it is
>> already "KDE branded".
>>
>> For me just "workspace" works.

A repo name of "workspace" lacks context outside of the initial clone
from git.kde.org. The "litmus" test so far for repositories I have
created is "does the repo name make sense by itself"? In this case I
don't think it does.

It should be named kde-workspace or sc-workspace from my point of view...

>
> But if I clone to a random folder or repo somewhere it's a bit too generic.  I
> think kderuntime and kdeworkspace keeps it consistent with the rest of the kde
> repo.
>
> John.
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>

Regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]