[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request: save/restore containments
From:       Chani <chanika () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-01-28 18:54:03
Message-ID: 201001281054.14675.chanika () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On January 27, 2010 08:57:18 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2713/#review3910
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > "make it activity-centric instead of containment-centric"
> > 
> > Activity is a user interface word and a concept of plasma-desktop /
> > plasma-netbook / etc. Containment is the libplasma API :)
> 
> well, talking about it at campkde the doubt really surfaced was:
> is really a good thing to mantain the concept of one activity=one
> contaiment?
> 
> problem could be for instance with multi monitor. if an activity is what
> i'm doing now, i am doing it on both monitor (depends also what the
> workflow is could be the case or not)
> 
> perhaps the pervirtualdesktopviews madness could also be mapped to -one-
> activity
> 

yeah... see... I kinda abused the word again.
in my mind, an Activity is an abstract concept, it's more like.. everything 
you're using to do a particular task. and we make it concrete (therefore 
easier for users to get a handle on) by tying it to a containment (or set of 
containments if you have >1 screen).

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]