[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] Standardize clocks config dialogs
From:       "Hans Chen" <hanswchen () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-01-21 21:22:50
Message-ID: c59230380801211322s17351680w8f099cf24cea265a () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


> So here is a new version using flat groupboxes, as in konsole.
> It really looks good, what do you think?

I still stand by my point. Although I understand that this isn't a way to
measure usability; that Coffee House thing sounds good. =)
It does look prettier with group boxes, and with grayed out list as default,
my eyes don't complain as much.

Just a question: I'm used to check boxes that enable widgets when checked,
not vice verse (I think). Is it something to be considered? (I'm pretty sure
it's just my memory playing tricks)

And finally: if there are only two appearance options, I would like to avoid
tabs too.

Regards,
Hans

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

&gt; So here is a new version using flat groupboxes, as in konsole.<br>&gt; It really \
looks good, what do you think?<br><br>I still stand by my point. Although I \
understand that this isn&#39;t a way to measure usability; that Coffee House thing \
sounds good. =) <br>It does look prettier with group boxes, and with grayed out list \
as default, my eyes don&#39;t complain as much.<br><br>Just a question: I&#39;m used \
to check boxes that enable widgets when checked, not vice verse (I think). Is it \
something to be considered? (I&#39;m pretty sure it&#39;s just my memory playing \
tricks) <br><br>And finally: if there are only two appearance options, I would like \
to avoid tabs too.<br><br>Regards,<br>Hans<br>



_______________________________________________
Panel-devel mailing list
Panel-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]