On 10/24/07, Sean Harmer <sh@theharmers.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Siraj,
>
> On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Siraj Razick wrote:
> > > I think that could work as long as we are careful to flush unneeded items
> > > from the cache so that it doesn't grow indefinitely.
> >
> > Qt DOSE this automatically  :-) , deletes the unwanted that is, so why
> > should we require a manual flush ? .
> OK I see now. I've just read the docs to QCache and friends. :-)
>
> > when the limit is full the insert will return false. so if needed we
> > could expand the size of the cache further . but still keeping the
> > size at a reasonable max so that
> > we will not have the system threshing. So 2 max limits.  1 the current
> > maximum of our cache ,  and the maximum value we will let the cache to
> > grow. this is my suggestion ;)
> I'm not even sure we need anything that complex. From the Qt docs it looks
> like the cache doesn't reserve the memory upfront, but only allocates it when
> objects are added to the cache (up to the limit of course).


> So the trick will be to determine what the limit should be. For this I need to
> dig deeper into the plasma code...
:-)

I'm looking at it too till weekend arrives :-)


Bye

>
> I'll try some options when I get some time (this weekend hopefully).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sean
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Panel-devel mailing list
> Panel-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Panel-devel mailing list
Panel-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel