[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-optimize
Subject: Re: icefox tests issues
From: Lubos Lunak <l.lunak () suse ! cz>
Date: 2004-10-21 8:46:40
Message-ID: 200410211046.40963.l.lunak () suse ! cz
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thursday 21 of October 2004 10:27, Juergen Pfennig wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 October 2004 21:47, Simon Perreault wrote:
> > Raul's results are very unsurprising and should be integrated with much
> > rejoicing.
>
> Ok, I was always tinking of simple types. I am not a friend of operator
> overloading in C++.
>
> But a factor of 5 (2 instead of 10s) just by removing some postfix
> increments?
I agree. The results are very surprising, and most likely wrong. It would
mean that just changing it++ to ++it in a loop removes 80% of executed code
from the loop. It can make things faster, but such big improvement is hard to
believe.
I suggest you repeat the test with exactly the same conditions for both of
the variants (i.e. reboot, do the test; change to the other variant, reboot,
do the test exactly the same way).
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: l.lunak@suse.cz , l.lunak@kde.org
Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
_______________________________________________
Kde-optimize mailing list
Kde-optimize@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-optimize
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic