[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-optimize
Subject:    Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] libkdeinit symbol pruning
From:       Karl Vogel <karl.vogel () seagha ! com>
Date:       2004-07-21 0:40:11
Message-ID: 200407210240.12125.karl.vogel () seagha ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Maks Orlovich wrote:

> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 08:09 pm, Karl Vogel wrote:
>> David Faure wrote:
>> > ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] libkdeinit symbol pruning
>> > Date: Tuesday 20 July 2004 21:30
>> > From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@kde.org>
>> > To: David Faure <faure@kde.org>
>> >
>> > That am_edit patch is broken, the unsermake patch should work :)
>> >
>> > Greetings, Stephan
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Great! But I'm wondering what the problem with the am_edit patch was
>> then?!
>>
>>
>> Anyway.. more goodies.. I just finished testing the GCC visibility patch
>> on QT (gcc 3.4):
> 
> 
> <snip excellent work>
> If I recall correctly, Qt also uses a version script, doesn't it?

Not that I'm aware off.. don't see anything special in mkspecs/linux-g++

Also note that a version script doesn't have the improvement in code 
generation. Gcc will still generate the jumps through a PLT since it doesn't 
know whether the symbol is going to be pruned or not.

_______________________________________________
Kde-optimize mailing list
Kde-optimize@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-optimize
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]