[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-optimize
Subject:    Re: Static functions
From:       Bo Thorsen <bo () sonofthor ! dk>
Date:       2004-01-12 14:44:51
Message-ID: 200401121544.51412.bo () sonofthor ! dk
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 12 January 2004 15:08, David Leimbach wrote:
> Hello Bo,
>
> On Jan 12, 2004, at 7:56 AM, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just convinced myself it was time to remind everyone of this old
> > feature: Static functions. I know lots of you already know about this
> > feature, but I've seen too many places where it isn't used, so I
> > thought
> > I'd give a heads up on it.
> > ...
> How you feel about achieving the same goal with anonymous namespaces?

I don't "feel" anything about it - if the symbols are gone from the symbol 
table, then that's all good. But I don't believe so, the file static 
functions are necessary to achieve this. Prove me wrong :-)

Bo.

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-optimize mailing list
Kde-optimize@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-optimize


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]