From kde-optimize Wed Feb 05 11:17:24 2003 From: Jordi Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:17:24 +0000 To: kde-optimize Subject: i18n X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-optimize&m=104444391130741 As long as a previous thread in this list stated that QString is not the most efficient thing in memory and CPU, why don't make i18n return a QConstString instead of a QString? I think is a very used function all over KDE. Maybe is needed that the .arg() will make the QConstString QString in order to add it the data. But _lots_ of text of KDE don't have .arg() , so it will be a gain ,no? -- Jordi Polo http://development.bluesock.net _______________________________________________ Kde-optimize mailing list Kde-optimize@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-optimize