From kde-multimedia Fri Jan 21 09:48:40 2000 From: Stefan Westerfeld Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:48:40 +0000 To: kde-multimedia Subject: Why not DCOP for aRts? X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-multimedia&m=94844812007727 Hi! As you know, aRts isn't using CORBA anymore, but it is also not using DCOP. If you asked yourself: why? wouldn't that be easier? I've written something for you...: http://space.twc.de/~stefan/kde/arts-mcop-doc/why-not-dcop.html To summarize, the issues I discussed are: - type concept - self describing interfaces of objects (interface repository) - integration of streaming - speed - protocol comparision - peer-to-peer vs. dcopserver routing - a (probably not quite good) benchmark - transparent usage as lib or remote - quality of service, stream transfer - MCOP doesn't use Qt By the way, MCOP is faster, and I have benchmarked it to 8000 synchronous invocations per second while DCOP does 2000 after my tests. Cu... Stefan -- -* Stefan Westerfeld, stefan@space.twc.de (PGP!), Hamburg/Germany KDE Developer, project infos at http://space.twc.de/~stefan/kde *-