[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-multimedia
Subject:    Re: Dropping mplayerthumbs from 16.08
From:       Andreas Scherf <ascherfy () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2016-03-29 15:39:33
Message-ID: CALLi5CtFUS1NWyqGdUxhFRC1jPFZo+RP2AEPcsJbK-fWshfbYQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Hello, sure the speed was one of the main reasons for integrating
ffmpegthumbnailer into kde. And I think it is better to maintain one system
instead of two.

So thumb up for dropping mplayerthumbs.

Cheers
Andreas
Am 29.03.2016 09:22 schrieb "Michael Palimaka" <kensington@gentoo.org>:

> On 25/03/16 09:49, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dimecres, 23 de mar=C3=A7 de 2016, a les 20:31:48 CET, Michael Palim=
aka va
> > escriure:
> >> Any thoughts about dropping mplayerthumbs from 16.08?
> >>
> >> It seems basically untouched for years, and I'm not sure if it's usefu=
l
> >> anymore now that dolphin is ported to KF5.
> >
> > Tehy could be ported to KF5 too, no?
>
> Sure, if someone is willing to do it.
>
> >
> > Any idea how these compare to ffmpegthumbnailers? Better, worse? thesam=
e?
>
> In my experience ffmpegthumbs is a bit faster because it uses ffmpeg
> directly instead of having to call mplayer for each file.
>
> It looks like there was some interest in ffmpegthumbs replacing
> mplayerthumbs when it was introduced
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.general/61129/). Some
> distros such as Fedora appear to no longer ship mplayerthumbs too.
> _______________________________________________
> kde-multimedia mailing list
> kde-multimedia@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<p dir="ltr">Hello, sure the speed was one of the main reasons for integrating \
ffmpegthumbnailer into kde. And I think it is better to maintain one system instead \
of two. </p> <p dir="ltr">So thumb up for dropping mplayerthumbs.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers<br>
Andreas</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Am 29.03.2016 09:22 schrieb &quot;Michael Palimaka&quot; \
&lt;<a href="mailto:kensington@gentoo.org">kensington@gentoo.org</a>&gt;:<br \
type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 25/03/16 09:49, Albert Astals \
Cid wrote:<br> &gt; El dimecres, 23 de març de 2016, a les 20:31:48 CET, Michael \
Palimaka va<br> &gt; escriure:<br>
&gt;&gt; Any thoughts about dropping mplayerthumbs from 16.08?<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; It seems basically untouched for years, and I&#39;m not sure if it&#39;s \
useful<br> &gt;&gt; anymore now that dolphin is ported to KF5.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Tehy could be ported to KF5 too, no?<br>
<br>
Sure, if someone is willing to do it.<br>
<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Any idea how these compare to ffmpegthumbnailers? Better, worse? thesame?<br>
<br>
In my experience ffmpegthumbs is a bit faster because it uses ffmpeg<br>
directly instead of having to call mplayer for each file.<br>
<br>
It looks like there was some interest in ffmpegthumbs replacing<br>
mplayerthumbs when it was introduced<br>
(<a href="http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.general/61129/" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.general/61129/</a>). \
Some<br> distros such as Fedora appear to no longer ship mplayerthumbs too.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
kde-multimedia mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kde-multimedia@kde.org">kde-multimedia@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia</a><br> \
</blockquote></div>


[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
kde-multimedia mailing list
kde-multimedia@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]