[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-multimedia
Subject:    Re: Progressive download in Phonon
From:       Jonathan Wong <jhannwong () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-06-06 14:20:40
Message-ID: 4A2A7B38.9090804 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I need reviews. How can my patches be approved without discussion with community needs?

I can commit? That's not good. I would hope the git is clean and tightly monitored, especially so
if there are very frequent commits.

Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Jonathan Wong <jhannwong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Whats wrong with normal streaming? I guess I don't get the
>>> difference.
>> Normal streaming don't save the video file on the client's hard disk, which is really what most
>> applications wanna do (not let general public store the broadcast video file).
>>
>> For an in-house peer-to-peer system, we need progressive download to reduce bandwidth usage.
>>
>> There's a whole argument about variable bitrate and streaming and such. At the moment, there isn't
>> a cost-effective way to store (on server) video files at various bitrates (forgot name of a
>> project that does it, but it's not in production state yet, I think).
>>
>>> Phonon is really lacking leadership at the moment.
>> Does that mean I can't submit patches?
> 
> Well you can send them here to review, but probably no one is going to
> commit them. You could do that yourself.
> 
> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> kde-multimedia mailing list
> kde-multimedia@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia
> 

_______________________________________________
kde-multimedia mailing list
kde-multimedia@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]