[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-multimedia
Subject:    Re: Choosing a Phonon backend
From:       "Tanguy Krotoff" <tkrotoff () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-03-29 17:54:45
Message-ID: 129f18a00803291054p6ef2293erb2b0562e62873a90 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Matthias Kretz <kretz@kde.org> wrote:
> On Saturday 29 March 2008, Tanguy Krotoff wrote:
>  > What do you think will improve Phonon?
>
>  Developers that put time into designing, writing and testing code for Phonon.

My gesticulations don't make people laugh but everybody embittered...

>  This has nothing to do with making it easier for developers to shoot
>  themselves into the foot.

So it's official, no
QObject * Phonon::getInternalBackend()
If I want to experiment features from the backend I cannot do it
officially, only through unreadable code that will this time for sure
really break.

And what about a Phonon::setPreferedBackendName() if my app need it as
I expose before?

-- 
Tanguy Krotoff <tkrotoff@gmail.com>
+33 6 68 42 70 24
_______________________________________________
kde-multimedia mailing list
kde-multimedia@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]