[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-multimedia
Subject:    Re: Vote for a MM system (Was: Re: summary of the aKademy meetings)
From:       Christian Esken <c.esken () cityweb ! de>
Date:       2004-09-09 20:06:12
Message-ID: 200409092206.12490.c.esken () cityweb ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 09 September 2004 15:35, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
 > On Thursday 09 September 2004 02:09, Christian Esken wrote:
> > Thus my vote will go to a MM API, that supports a MM backend system \
> > that fulfills all of the following properties: a) Can NOW play audio \
> > and video b) Is quite stable (running and API-wise)
> > c) Is available NOW
> > d) Is available NOW on multiple Operating Systems (at least Linux, \
> >                 Solaris,
> > *BSD [preferably FreeBSD] ). e) Is NOW maintained by a large developer \
> > base f) has an OpenSource license
> > g) has an open development mentality (stuff like "open" development \
> > lists, "open" bug system, ...)
> > 
> 
> You sound exactly like that NMM guy that listed things they did well as \
> the  base requirements..

Well, I don't have any sound system at all running on my main computer \
(arts does not work at all), and I am not affiliated to any sound system \
development. I feel in fact quite neutral in terms of which MM backend KDE \
will chose.

And I am really aware that stating 7 points as very important is much. But, \
what would you say: Which of my stated requirements are not important for a \
KDE MM backend? Which important thing have I forgotten?


> Sorry if you want to the equivalent of X for audio, you need 
> network-transparency and esd or the polypaudio servers just doesnt cut \
> it.  Without proper synchonization, they are both silly playthings. 

Well, that would be nice. But we could start with a simpler thing.
Also X did not start with X11, there was X10, X9, ..., X1.
And no ... I don't want to revive XAudio. ;-)

Also there are MM backends that are already network capable:
MAS and NMM.
GStreamer is not.
But I would not put too much pressure on the network capabilities at this \
point of time. Just look at those Operting Systems with high-end Audio \
Applications - the Mac and Win stuff. How much network-audio is built in \
there?

Medium-term we definitely want audio-networking - because it is cool and \
has many nice uses.

Chris
_______________________________________________
kde-multimedia mailing list
kde-multimedia@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]