From kde-maemo  Fri Oct 15 15:55:30 2010
From: Frederik Gladhorn <gladhorn () kde ! org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:55:30 +0000
To: kde-maemo
Subject: Re: newbie questions
Message-Id: <201010151755.34892.gladhorn () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-maemo&m=128715819309764
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0078859840=="

--===============0078859840==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart4555599.0TDRMPF24b";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart4555599.0TDRMPF24b
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
this may answer some of your questions (not really, but a little). And no,=
=20
this is not with my Nokia hat on.

http://meego.com/community/blogs/harrihakulinen/2010/meego-calling-n900

Greetings
=46rederik


Am Montag 4. Oktober 2010, 13.02.25 schrieb Artur de Souza:
> Quoting Jeffery MacEachern <j.maceachern@gmail.com>:
> > You'd have to get a comment from Nokia, and I think whatever they've
> > said so far is all they're likely to for the moment.  What I have
> > personally seen from official sources is that the N900 is not
> > commercially supported for MeeGo.  So, they will not be selling N900s
> > with MeeGo, and they have no obligation to provide support, or
> > anything else that goes with that.  However, to my knowledge you are
> > right about it being a reference device, and those aren't mutually
> > exclusive statements: what Nokia "supports", and what Nokia chooses to
> > throw money and coders at are entirely different things, and - in this
> > case - for entirely different purposes.  I think it's safe to assume
> > that when MeeGo has matured some more, that installing and running
> > some form of it on the N900 will be a viable proposition, however, I
> > really doubt it will ever be "mainstream" even in the limited sense
> > that the N900 originally was/is.  I would also recommend that you read
> > the MeeGo/ARM section of the wiki, and compare the wording used for
> > the N900 porting project to that of the N810 project, which is
> > /definitely/ not "supported" in any sense of the word.
>=20
> This is exactly what I meant :) Thanks for the clarification. I can +1
> you on this that this is Nokia's *official* (whatever it means)
> position until now. That's exactly what they have said so far and what
> it looks like will happen.
>=20
> Cheers,
>=20
> -------------------------------------------
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-mobile mailing list
> Kde-mobile@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mobile


--nextPart4555599.0TDRMPF24b
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAky4eXIACgkQcZKJUyELiPcIlQCdHt+mkP+lQ/3dtys+WtM/6X3E
N/4AmwWRWMW2Xx3b4n28p30m/z1DnEiz
=1qwW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4555599.0TDRMPF24b--

--===============0078859840==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Kde-mobile mailing list
Kde-mobile@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mobile

--===============0078859840==--