[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-mac
Subject:    Re: [KDE/Mac] A (non)success story of digiKam on OSX/MacPorts involving kde4-workspace and qtcurve
From:       <MK-MacPorts () techno ! ms>
Date:       2015-03-14 17:12:01
Message-ID: 48AE13FD-4F6E-4040-9CFD-56D88261C557 () techno ! ms
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi René,

On 14 Mar 2015, at 16:15 , René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2) Does it make sense to introduce a _metaport_, which depends on kdelibs4,
> > qtcurve and kde4-workspace and which all other KDE ports should in turn
> > depend on - instead of directly depending on kdelibs4?
> 
> That would be the best option IMHO, and one might even argue that kde4-workspace \
> could be such a meta-port.

well, true.


> Add kde4-baseapps, kde4-runtime and QtCurve as a replacement for the buggy Oxygen \
> theme and you're close to what one might indeed call a KDE4 workspace on OS X.

I guess all that is a good idea, although it's quite a load of dependencies then.


> Making all packages depend on this package might be a bit overkill, as this will be \
> introducing dependencies on things like kdepimlibs and through that akonadi. 

Looks like for the sake of a sane environment one has to go this way…

Greets,
Marko
_______________________________________________
kde-mac@kde.org
List Information: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mac
KDE/Mac Information: http://community.kde.org/Mac


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]