[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-mac
Subject:    Re: [KDE/Mac] Avoiding baloo trouble
From:       mk-lists () email ! de
Date:       2014-05-01 17:48:12
Message-ID: 937C633F-2B7F-4687-9B53-AFDD737C50A3 () email ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Hi Nicolas,

> It is possible to build KDE without it, which is not an option with nepomuk. 
oh, is that so?
From what I read on KDE-DEVEL it could be that some applications won’t work properly \
or complain during build time if baloo isn’t enabled.

> This should make it possible to provide it as a variant with Macports, so that \
> users could have it if desired, but without imposing it or requiring active changes \
> by users who don’t want it around. 
Well, if that’s possible great. I think baloo should be opt-in-able for those who \
want it, but per default be set to off. Do you agree?

Greets,
Marko


["signature.asc" (signature.asc)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTYojcAAoJEF+eBjyS/5c/YksH/iuFkTU4GZSOsnwipKPr2FQm
gECrG/b9iXue4HAxREdpL7kTwiZaN1Kjm1EdswoiWxeqr+4qzEZu9bRu+G4sGezJ
jNZs1ip0O5TgRq5ReQS0mfVzGcy6cn+jLy2hQsmztxUFFAJeFutOYgt0E1vIDvgc
jcc0HgsXQxILZ7iOF2FLQB8czPHmR3By/u5KKMRrEEwAAzF1YlfL+Jdp3df+5Fdu
vaPAccKEkN/ETX89QvpPu5AzT1vWD3AzrSZq46geDBd7zeOsbqe3UnJ6otncy0Tf
NhRJO7v7mI67JPOxMZG6Zc0NOkAn8/+FXK5+wm5VbZvxboY/drjOfp6YsHk30ns=
=HAm/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
kde-mac@kde.org
List Information: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mac
KDE/Mac Information: http://community.kde.org/Mac

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]