[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: QT Designer _NOT_ under QPL.
From:       mosfet <mosfet () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2000-08-18 20:00:03
[Download RAW message or body]

Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> 
> mosfet wrote:
> 
> > > 2- If you think that Troll `putting designer under the GPL' gains
> > >    points with RMS, you are mistaken.
> > >
> >
> > Are you RMS?
> 
> I guess I know him better than you do then.
> 
> > > 3- You haven't responded to my point 2, which RMS said on this
> > >    mailing list yesterday was a bad idea.
> >
> > This is your point 2? :
> >
> > > > > > >                                and telling the world they use the
> > > > > > > GPL to license their Qt-linked apps
> > >
> > > This was point 2.
> >
> > *Shrug* People can use the GPL for their Qt apps if they damn well
> > please. Sorry if you don't like this but you have absolutely no right to
> > tell people what license they use for the code they write.
> 
> We weren't talking about me.  What I wrote was:
> 
>                                  and telling the world they use the
>   GPL to license their Qt-linked apps won't help Troll get on RMS'
>   good side.  They appear to prefer the defiant approach.
> 
> We were talking about collaborating about RMS to change the GPL.
> Hard to do with such a defiant attitude.
> 

Who are you to talk about Troll Tech's relationship with RMS? Arrogance,
yet again.

> I'm done for today.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]