"Darren O. Benham" wrote:
> 
...snip...
> 
> I'm making just that point inside the Debian project.  Having flame quality
> rants that exicte the more volitle and opinionated in the project does not
> help.
> 

Requiring license changes that have no legal basis then calling KDE
illegal does not help on my end ;-)

> > Quite honestly, screw this. It's not fair to KDE and things like this
> > are a large part of why most KDE people simply ignore Debian.
> 
> If KDE wouldn't blanket ignore all Debian and try working with the ones that
> are reasonable, we might be able to settle this.  That does not mean,
> necessarily, that KDE would go into Debian but atleast Debian and KDE can be
> friends and the reasons Debian give mirror reality.
> 
...snip..

Yes, but neither is it KDE's responsibility to sort through what is
legit coming from Debian and what is not. I've spent way more time on it
than I would like.

> >
> > </rant>
> ditto
> 
> --
> Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
> * http://benham.net/index.html        <gecko@benham.net>           <><  *
> * Debian:                             Software in the Public Interest:  *
> *   Project Secretary                   Treasurer                       *
> *   Webmaster Team                                                      *
> *   BTS Team                          siteROCK:                         *
> *   Lintian Team                        Linux Infrastructure Engineer   *
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature

-- 
Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
http://www.mosfet.org - The place for KDE development news.
mosfet@mandrakesoft.com
mosfet@kde.org