Joseph Carter wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:04:32AM -0400, forge wrote:
> > > > One thing though.  What's wrong with section 4 ?
> > >
> > > IIRC something like the BSD advertising clause.  I'll look later, I'm a
> > > bit busy doing Real Work (writing video games, what else?) just now..
> >
> > Just because you are having fun doesn't mean you have to gloat :)
> 
> Do you want to figure this out?  =p  The code I'm looking at is a software
> vector transformation implementation that doesn't seem to be necessary,
> but can't be optimized out until I figure out WTF it _does_ exactly.
> Which isn't even apparent yet - I'm not even sure how this compiles and
> runs without dying because of a null pointer since I sure can't find the
> call to the function that sets it anywhere...
> 
> Sheer madness.

That's what I meant by fun :).

I envy you programers and all this bug tracking stuff.  It looks
like a lot more fun than tracking down which of the 6 "working" 
drives on the SCSI chain is messing with the whole system or why 
some nodes on a 100 Mbps network only seam to connect at modem 
like speeds.  Anytime I solve a big problem I go and catch up on 

  http://www.uk.linux.org/diary

just so I don't start feeling smug.  When you have time for this 
stuff let me know.  

PS : Is GDB as much fun as a 40oz Ball Pin Hammer ?