[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: A Detailed Analysis of the GPL For KDE/QT
From:       Sirtaj Singh Kang <ssk () physics ! unimelb ! edu ! au>
Date:       1998-10-23 14:00:31
[Download RAW message or body]


On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
[snip]
> If you provide a xerox service for public use you're obligated to make it
> clear that you're not doing so to violate copyright.  

I want to know about this obligation and in which nations it holds. I have
used scores of libraries in perhaps 4 or 5 countries and I have never seen
this "obligatory" warning at or around any of their copiers. Is the
situation dramatically different in the US? 

> What other people do which doesn't involve what you do is not your
> responsibility. 

Good, now that you've said that, we shall keep it for reference if this
comes up again.

-Taj.

Sirtaj S. Kang       taj@kde.org         ssk@physics.unimelb.edu.au
School of Physics    Univ of Melbourne   KDE: The Desktop sans Toga

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic