[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: Oxygen font licensing
From:       vern adams <vern () newtypography ! co ! uk>
Date:       2012-03-09 6:56:23
Message-ID: BD51AD79-D633-4927-A920-5D63A1CBE07B () newtypography ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

I need to double check on this.
The source could (should?) be dual licensed right now, but, the google webfont version of \
'oxygen regular' will be released in a few weeks, so the dual licensing will for sure kick in \
then. To be honest i am no licensing expert and have simply neglected that dual-aspect on the \
git repository. I thought someone else with repo access might have done it by now ;)  I'm happy \
for others to do it whenever/however they think is correct. If anyone wants to get the LGPL \
licensing sorted for the repo, please do it.

-vern



On 8 Mar 2012, at 22:00, Jonathan Riddell wrote:

> 
> As I understand it the decision has been to dual licence under SIL and LGPL?  Is this change \
> going to be reflected in the git archive? 
> Jonathan

_______________________________________________
Kde-licensing mailing list
Kde-licensing@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]