[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-licensing
Subject: Re: QPL still needed?
From: Kevin Forge <forge () myrealbox ! com>
Date: 2003-04-08 22:24:26
[Download RAW message or body]
Matthias Ettrich wrote:
>On Tuesday 08 April 2003 04:59, Kevin Forge wrote:
>
>
>>The lack of clarity is in and of itself reason enogh to cover everyones
>>asses with the QPL.
>>
>>The code in KDE itself is all compatible with the GPL. However as you
>>point out there are
>>comersial QT apps out there.
>>
>>
>
>As I wrote in my previous email, that can be covered for with a little
>exception.
>
>
But exceptions open up a huge can of worms. Onless of course you were
to use the same exception
that the GNU compilers and the Kernel use. :)
>>There might be apps onder the old BSD license or other none GPL
>>compatible licenses.
>> I don't know of any specific ones (but they are probebly just
>>unpopular).
>>
>>BTW: This license change would put TheKompany.com out of business.
>>
>>
>
>??? What makes you think that? Please elaborate.
>
> Matthias
>
The business model they use asumes customers have ready access to a free
QT runtime.
"ready access" also means not being called pirates by the cluless.
Which would hapen if
QT were under a GPL+excemption license.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic