[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: PortAudio
From:       Neil Stevens <neil () qualityassistant ! com>
Date:       2003-03-05 5:45:45
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday March 04, 2003 09:22, Stefan Westerfeld wrote:
>    Hi!
>
> Could anybody please review that
>
>   http://www.portaudio.com/license.html
>
> complies with the KDE licensing policy (i.e. that we could include
> that). I think it does, but as we have an extra list for legal issues, I
> think it shouldn't hurt to ask.

It's virtually identical to existing licenses used in KDE.  The major 
difference is this part:

"Any person wishing to distribute modifications to the Software is 
requested to send the modifications to the original developer so that they 
can be incorporated into the canonical version."

And that's just a request, so it should not matter.  I don't imagine 
licensing issues would keep KDE from using it.

- -- 
Neil Stevens - neil@qualityassistant.com
"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will
look upon the act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
 -- Gandhi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+ZY8Jf7mnligQOmERAnnoAJsFDqdKtbpmzTL12xCMfk1Z5Vh0HgCgi6lt
dryOpnQXJlg7x9M4RomWt1c=
=md5s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]