[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kuml
Subject:    [KUML] Compilation problems on Solaris 2.6 no more.
From:       "Riehl, Jonathan (Jonathan) *CTR*"
Date:       2000-03-02 20:50:42
[Download RAW message or body]

I think the problem I was having was with the precompiled Qt and KDE libs I
was using.  They were most likely built with a different compiler than the
one I am using (probably egcs or somesuch.)  I tried to recompile Qt first,
but it includes X11 files that cause gcc 2.95.2 to puke (by enforcing strict
C++ typing rules that extern "C" wouldn't fix.)  It didn't help my KUML
build
that I switched from GCC 2.8.1 to 2.95.2 after 2.8.1 choked on the C++
syntax
in KUML.  Realizing my mistake, I rebuilt the whole thing using one
compiler,
and while I still get a whole bunch of linker warnings, I got KUML to
compile.
Anyway, I'm glad I didn't tax too much mindshare on this dingy problem.
I think I'll go ahead and get on the devel list...I was going to take dia
and
make a Rational Rose killer if I hadn't discovered this effort. :)

-Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Darius Stachow [mailto:shiva@dialup.nacamar.de]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 2:05 PM
To: kuml@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
Subject: Re: Greetings and newbie questions...


Hi !

On Die, 29 Feb 2000, you wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>	I just joined the list, and I am interested in discussing KUML from
>the basics
>on up.  I am currently trying to build the latest release on Solaris 2.6,
>and I am
>getting a whole bunch of struct size and byte alignment mismatches in the
>linker.  
Unfortunately I have no idea what is the problem and so I can't help. I am
working on a linux system and there are no problems.
If you find a solution please tell me or better write it down. This could
be the start of a first FAQ.
BTW: Actually most if not all discussions are done on the mailing list
kuml-devel. If you're interested in discussing you should subscribe to this
list. And there is an archive for both mailing lists available at
lists.kde.org.

>If there is a FAQ, or someone has covered this, I'd sure appreciate any
>information.
I am sorry, there is no FAQ nor other documentation available yet.

-- 
Open your mind ...
Darius Stachow

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]