--===============1046041381==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1742881.dV9xuagP2B";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1742881.dV9xuagP2B
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 19 October 2006 05:15, Federico Zenith wrote:
> Alle 10:56, gioved=C3=AC 19 ottobre 2006, hai scritto:
> > Federico Zenith wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I am referring to this subfolder of l10n/templates/messages in trunk:
> > > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n/templates/messages/kdekiosk/
> > > (Ie. NOT to the extragear-sysadmin project)
> > >
> > > This project has a grand total of 13 messages, yet it represents an
> > > entire package in trunk. As the files show hardly any activity since
> > > over 16 months (and did not have that much even before), I would assu=
me
> > > the project is dead. Was it a precursor to kiosktool in
> > > extragear-sysadmin? If the project is not dead, shouldn't it be moved
> > > to a more sensible location (like a playground or kdereview?)
> > >
> > > The project kdekiosk refers to is KiOSKE, which has not seen any
> > > development in the last 17 months, except some routine/automated
> > > maintenance. http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdekiosk/kioske/
> >
> > I haven't used it myself (yet, it's still in the long pipeline), but I
> > know that at least many LTSP* setups use KDE in kiosk mode. I don't know
> > if this is the particular app they use for it, but I'd guess it is. Or
> > has it been superseded by some other app doing the same, only *better*?
> >
> > That not much development is being done on an app, doesn't mean it's
> > unnecessary or unwanted. Perhaps it's perfect or as good as it gets
> > already? I'd say keep it, until/unless it *is* superseded by something
> > better.
>
> Yep, I agree. My point is that it really looks like kdekiosk is being
> developed in extragear-sysadmin, and, even if it were not, it does not ma=
ke
> much sense to have a top-level folder for so few PO files, when the
> application could instead be placed in some extragear or playground.
>
> I CC to the kde-kiosk mailing list, they are probably best suited to
> explain the situation.

I am not aware of anyone using http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdekiosk/kioske/=
 I=20
think it would have been more appropriately placed in playground. It has no=
=20
relationship with kiosktool (which is in extragear)

Cheers,
Waldo
=2D-=20
Linux Client Architect - Channel Platform Solutions Group - Intel Corporati=
on

--nextPart1742881.dV9xuagP2B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFSAVqN4pvrENfboIRArZfAJ0Zwn+YUMKhPoaWLnXO8N7xnsO/GACfcEZl
7g0mg/dSEwuoxuhi/S4yYDo=
=XrxH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1742881.dV9xuagP2B--

--===============1046041381==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
kde-kiosk mailing list
kde-kiosk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-kiosk

--===============1046041381==--