--===============3070569395268130316== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134a45c63438e04f10de376 --001a1134a45c63438e04f10de376 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> On Tuesday 28 January 2014 Jan 14:35:33 David Revoy wrote: >> Bug 329026 "Weird brush spacing with rotation->drawing angle" >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329026 >> Bug 313494 " [ sensor / dynamics ] Hue / Saturation / Value sensors are >> broken " https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313494 > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > These issues have always been present, haven't they? If they are regressions, we should bump their priority, but given our constraints, I think we're already ambitious for 2.8, so I would hesitate to make them release blockers for 2.8.0. There's be bug fixes after that, too, of course. Yes, those two issues were always around as far as I remember/use , so ok to let them for after 2.8 :-) ( maybe hiding the sensor's label for 2.8 release ; Hue / Saturation / Value ? ) --001a1134a45c63438e04f10de376 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable