--===============5747624168321460845==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c7380b820804dd0e52f6
--089e0158c7380b820804dd0e52f6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi guys. As an effort to make Krita used by artists in my studio I have to
show them why it is beneficial to use Krita over Photoshop on wine (or ever
harder, photoshop on a windows box).
My first step would be to, at least, replace Photoshop CS2 on wine with
Krita.
The first hurdle and the hardest one to justify for now is performance.
Even though Krita says it does high bit depth and large size canvas on the
UI (and the website), it still does not make it possible to do any work at
those high resolutions.
A very simple example, is to put CS2 on wine and Krita, on the same machine
running next to each other.
In this test I created an A4, 300dpi document, then I painted it with fill
and gradient. So far so good. Then I doubled the size of the document
again, I could see krita was starting to slow down, but it was still ok. I
then attempted to double the canvs again, but that was a limit I think. So
I moved on to convert to 16bit. Photoshop did it effortlessly, but Krita
crash.
This is only the first of a series of comparisons I will run. But,
essentially, if Krita cannot outperform Photoshop on wine, it's impossible
for me to convert my studio to it. The price tag is not really an issue,
what our artists need is performance. Even the UI quirks are something
artists can get used to, Mari was adopted in the industry extremely quickly
even though it had a UI no one had used before. Because performance drew
the industry to use it.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/21dsg43xhdu86hc/test_1.mpg
--
Simon Legrand
http://slegrand.blogspot.com/
--089e0158c7380b820804dd0e52f6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi guys. As an effort to make Krita used by artists in my =
studio I have to show them why it is beneficial to use Krita over Photoshop=
on wine (or ever harder, photoshop on a windows box).
My first step would be to, at least, replace Photoshop CS2 on wine with Kri=
ta.=A0
The first hurdle and the hardest one to jus=
tify for now is performance. Even though Krita says it does high bit depth =
and large size canvas on the UI (and the website), it still does not make i=
t possible to do any work at those high resolutions.
A very simple example, is to put CS2 on wine and Krita,=
on the same machine running next to each other.
I=
n this test I created an A4, 300dpi document, then I painted it with fill a=
nd gradient. So far so good. Then I doubled the size of the document again,=
I could see krita was starting to slow down, but it was still ok. I then a=
ttempted to double the canvs again, but that was a limit I think. So I move=
d on to convert to 16bit. Photoshop did it effortlessly, but Krita crash.=
div>
This is only the first of a series of comparisons I wil=
l run. But, essentially, if Krita cannot outperform Photoshop on wine, it=
39;s impossible for me to convert my studio to it. The price tag is not rea=
lly an issue, what our artists need is performance. Even the UI quirks are =
something artists can get used to, Mari was adopted in the industry extreme=
ly quickly even though it had a UI no one had used before. Because performa=
nce drew the industry to use it.=A0
--089e0158c7380b820804dd0e52f6--
--===============5747624168321460845==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Krita mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
--===============5747624168321460845==--