[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: About the Brush Outline
From:       Sven Langkamp <sven.langkamp () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-07-21 18:02:06
Message-ID: CAAmsBf=1qea_G0pNShGkn2rYj5U80A=CuKtceiZAg6RzjLY0Jg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Ram=F3n Miranda <mirandagraphic@gmail.com=
>wrote:

>
>
> I agree with Boud
>> " they only want to know what part of their work will be covered
>> (approximately)."
>> I need to Know how much surface i am going to cover with my brushtroke.
>> That is what i called accurate work. and i think we only need that an
>> outline of the brush, not two.
>> anyway the bigger size of pressure at 100% will be enough . Right now i
>> found ok on Pixel Brush (see attached image) . but when the outline is
>> complex ,brush looks weird. and tends to be slower. (see attached image)
>> maybe a simplified outline would be better .
>>
>> http://www.pasteall.org/pic/15158
>

I have now readded the code that skips the path inside. Please checkout if
that is simple enough.

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Ramón Miranda <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mirandagraphic@gmail.com">mirandagraphic@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, \
204, 204);padding-left:1ex">I agree with Boud <br><div class="im"><div>&quot; they \
only want to know what part of their work will be covered (approximately).&quot; <br>

</div></div>I need to Know how much surface i am going to cover with my brushtroke. \
That is what i called accurate work. and i think we only need that an outline of the \
brush, not two. <br> anyway the bigger size of pressure at 100% will be enough . \
Right now i found ok on Pixel Brush (see attached image) . but when the outline is \
complex ,brush looks weird. and tends to be slower. (see attached image) maybe a \
simplified outline would be better .<div>

<div></div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><a \
href="http://www.pasteall.org/pic/15158" \
target="_blank">http://www.pasteall.org/pic/15158</a> \
<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>I have now readded the code that skips the path \
inside. Please checkout if that is simple enough. <br> </div></div>



_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]