'Re: [calligra/krita-fixsmudgebrush-silvioheinrich]'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: [calligra/krita-fixsmudgebrush-silvioheinrich]
From:       David REVOY <davidrevoy () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-03-18 21:52:16
Message-ID: 4D83D410.7030602 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

Hi,

I did a speedpainting with the new smudge brush to test ( a fan-art of 
Ryu ) ; very good tool and good feeling with ; a bit creamy/oily as I like
http://twitpic.com/4asg6i
Congratz for the developement, I will use it.

Btw, I agree with the review of Animtim.

-David

On 03/18/2011 04:00 PM, Timothée Giet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my review for the new smudge brush compared to the old one.
>
> Good points:
> -The Color option (NICE!!!)
> -the overlay mode (GREAT!)
> -doesn't need copy mode
> -doesn't have size/pressure artefacts bug
>
> Bad points:
> -Doesn't work in mirror mode
> -no "opacity" setting like in old smudge.
>
> Performance is not too bad, comparable to the one of the old smudge, 
> that is slower than paint brush
> So it would be great if you could find some way to optimize it, anyway 
> it's already more than usable
> (in my test, 50pix brush is fine, 100pix is laggy, 200pix is very 
> laggy/unusable )
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kimageshop mailing list
> kimageshop@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Hi,<br>
    <br>
    I did a speedpainting with the new smudge brush to test ( a fan-art
    of Ryu ) ; very good tool and good feeling with ; a bit creamy/oily
    as I like <br>
    <a href="http://twitpic.com/4asg6i">http://twitpic.com/4asg6i</a><br>
    Congratz for the developement, I will use it.<br>
    &nbsp; <br>
    Btw, I agree with the review of Animtim. <br>
    <br>
    -David<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    On 03/18/2011 04:00 PM, Timoth&eacute;e Giet wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:AANLkTimCphD6oaoQPiYP_4Lx-c1zbrEeTU-hFrnkCQ5H@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">Hi,<br>
      <br>
      Here is my review for the new smudge brush compared to the old
      one.<br>
      <br>
      Good points:<br>
      -The Color option (NICE!!!)<br>
      -the overlay mode (GREAT!)<br>
      -doesn't need copy mode<br>
      -doesn't have size/pressure artefacts bug<br>
      <br>
      Bad points:<br>
      -Doesn't work in mirror mode<br>
      -no "opacity" setting like in old smudge.<br>
      <br>
      Performance is not too bad, comparable to the one of the old
      smudge, that is slower than paint brush<br>
      So it would be great if you could find some way to optimize it,
      anyway it's already more than usable<br>
      (in my test, 50pix brush is fine, 100pix is laggy, 200pix is very
      laggy/unusable )<br>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" \
href="mailto:kimageshop@kde.org">kimageshop@kde.org</a> <a \
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" \
href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop</a>
 </pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>

_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 