On Monday 10 January 2011, JL VT wrote:
> Other than that I think your brush is fine for me (I don't know about the
> rest), since 2.4 is in development I think it would be good if your brush
> could be added with a new name, for example Smudge 2, such that artists can
> test it and directly compare it with the old Smudge Brush, they will be the
> first ones to notice any regression (because regressions are hard to gauge
> anyway, sometimes what looks like an advancement to someone will look like a
> regression to somebody else).
> 

That's a practicaly solution, I support that. I also read on the gimp mailing list that they might have fixed the gimp's problem with dynamics and smudge; that might be a good thing to look at in our enduring quest for Really Good Smudging.

> Here is me hoping to see you around in the near future,
> Thank you for your contributions!

Same here!

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop