On Thursday 06 January 2011, Silvio Grosso wrote:

> To sum up, the implementation proposed by Lukas for a new mixing brush
> engine is less "ambitious" but it is very likely to work out fine in the
> end. 
> On the contrary, the path proposed by Pentalis is much more "risky" but, in
> the end, it might be more beneficial for Krita's development.
> 

I think we can afford to take the risk. I also think that it would be best for pentalis to take one step at a time, so first get a framework done, then add simple mixing -- and then continue with the other options.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop