[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Animation paintop, bad performance
From:       Dmitry Kazakov <dimula73 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-10-21 15:35:30
Message-ID: AANLkTimB06J6_DbNEZQRBq-OB+td9O0HNy2WwYN97nLq () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


>
> On Wednesday 20 October 2010 16:17:15 Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
> > Yes, you may try to use the only setDirty() for a resulting rect.
>
> addDirtyRect is called by bitBlt. How can I influence that on the paintop
> level?
>

Hm.. Then, probably, that this is not the cause if the flickering, as
addDirtyRect() does not call setDirty(), and, most probably, these two rects
are optimized out by the scheduler.


-- 
Dmitry Kazakov

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt \
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div \
class="im">On Wednesday 20 October 2010 16:17:15 Dmitry Kazakov wrote:<br>

&gt; Yes, you may try to use the only setDirty() for a resulting rect.<br>
<br>
</div>addDirtyRect is called by bitBlt. How can I influence that on the paintop<br>
level?<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Hm.. Then, probably, that this is not the cause if the \
flickering, as addDirtyRect() does not call setDirty(), and, most probably, these two \
rects are optimized out by the scheduler.<br></div></div> <br clear="all"><br>-- \
<br>Dmitry Kazakov<br>



_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]