[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: About mipmapping and further planning
From:       Dmitry Kazakov <dimula73 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-07-10 11:36:54
Message-ID: AANLkTim_oP-Lw2XlIbgFTv8DuLD9Ugicc9aDSGk9bk96 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


> For the paintops: What would it require to get a paintop to work with
> mipmapping? Maybe we would just special case for the most common paintops
> like pixel brush to enable them to paint on a scale-down version. It would
> be just an approximation, but it might be worth the work if it's close
> enough to the real result.
>

We will need to be able to save a vector trace of the paintop *somewhere* to
populate the stroke from the top of the pyramid to the bottom as well. And
it'll be quite difficult to achieve.

-- 
Dmitry Kazakov

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt \
0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">For the \
paintops: What would it require to get a paintop to work with mipmapping? Maybe we \
would just special case for the most common paintops like pixel brush to enable them \
to paint on a scale-down version. It would be just an approximation, but it might be \
worth the work if it&#39;s close enough to the real result.<br> \
</blockquote><div><br>We will need to be able to save a vector trace of the paintop \
*somewhere* to populate the stroke from the top of the pyramid to the bottom as well. \
And it&#39;ll be quite difficult to achieve.<br>  <br> </div></div>-- <br>Dmitry \
Kazakov<br>



_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]