[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Photographic features and other non-paint features)
From:       "LukasT.dev () gmail ! com" <lukast ! dev () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-03-02 9:40:36
Message-ID: 201003021040.36311.LukasT.dev () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 02 March 2010 10:22:04 Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > No, it's not just that: it's that these filters don't fit the vision of a
> > high-end painting application. Emboss has useful properties, which is
> > probably why Cyrille put a question mark next to them. Raindrops and
> > oilpaint would be much nicer if implemented as brushes instead of
> > filters, probably as part of the deform brush. That way, the result will
> > be dependent upon the artistic skill of the user and different from
> > artist to artist instead of mostly similar.
> 
> This makes sense. Actually integrating the raindrop effect in the deform
> brush sounds like a fun idea. If nobody else wants to do it, I will have a
> look at it.

I wrote deform brush so I will review your patch then. 

_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic