--===============1448516451== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d2eddb3f5304746965ba --00504502d2eddb3f5304746965ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thursday 24 September 2009, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > > I think we should keep the layer/new just to keep it consistent. There > are > > even more option than in the layerbox. > > That's why I wanted to keep the options below the separator, they aren't > elsewhere. > > > I would keep remove and properties too for completeness. Hide/show should > > go. > > But esp. properties is buggy: it doesn't work the same way as in the > layerbox. > So instead of trying to fix the stupid bug, I'd like t > > > I agree that raise, lower, top, bottom waste much space there, we could > > move them to a seperate submenu (or remove). > > These are in the layer box, so I want to remove them. > If you apply the same to the mask menu and remove everything that's in the layer box only mirror horizontal and vertical would be left. > > Same for scale, mirror, rotate and shear. These would fit into a > > Transformation submenu. > > Ok -- but I'm not sure we can add a submenu at this time, since that needs > a > new string. > Right we either have to keep that till the string freeze is over or use an existing string. We have "Transform" as translated string in the transformation tool can we use that in an action too? > > Flatten image should be in image, I think. > > Didn't we discuss this before? > We did, but didn't draw a conclusion. --00504502d2eddb3f5304746965ba Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Boudewijn Rempt= <boud@valdyas.org= > wrote:
On Thursday 24 September 2009, Sven Langkamp wrote:

> I think we should keep the layer/new just to keep it consistent. There= are
> even more option than in the layerbox.

That's why I wanted to keep the options below the separator, they= aren't
elsewhere.

> I would keep remove and properties too for completeness. Hide/show sho= uld
> go.

But esp. properties is buggy: it doesn't work the same way as in = the layerbox.
So instead of trying to fix the stupid bug, I'd like t

> I agree that raise, lower, top, bottom waste much space there, we coul= d
> =A0move them to a seperate submenu (or remove).

These are in the layer box, so I want to remove them.

If you apply the same to the mask menu = and remove everything that's in the layer box only mirror horizontal an= d vertical would be left.
=A0
> Same for scale, mirror, rotate and shear. These would fit into a
> Transformation submenu.

Ok -- but I'm not sure we can add a submenu at this time, since t= hat needs a
new string.

Right we eithe= r have to keep that till the string freeze is over or use an existing strin= g. We have "Transform" as translated string in the transformation= tool can we use that in an action too?
=A0
> Flatten image should be in image, I think.

Didn't we discuss this before?

We did, b= ut didn't draw a conclusion.

--00504502d2eddb3f5304746965ba-- --===============1448516451== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ kimageshop mailing list kimageshop@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop --===============1448516451==--