From kde-kimageshop Tue Sep 15 20:54:48 2009 From: Boudewijn Rempt Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:54:48 +0000 To: kde-kimageshop Subject: Re: Yet another bug. This time filters vs selections Message-Id: <200909152254.48930.boud () valdyas ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-kimageshop&m=125304792028021 On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Dmitry Kazakov wrote: > > Again. That is a binary transparency iteration that is not good itself. > > We need a full-featured transparency with 256 levels of transparency. > > At risk of a dumb question, something I am wondering from this and the > other recent thread (embedded transparency)... why 256 levels? That's > fine for 8-bits/channel color spaces, but will selection and masks never > support 16-bit? 256 levels is enough for everyone! But seriously, never say never -- but 8 bit masks is what we have now, and that implemenation detail returns everywhere, unfortunately. -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org _______________________________________________ kimageshop mailing list kimageshop@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop