[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Problems with "embedded" transparency masks onto adj. layers
From:       Dmitry Kazakov <dimula73 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-09-08 17:20:04
Message-ID: ae32c1ef0909081020x242e6da0h63637783a7eed174 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


> It used to work just fine in 1.6, where we used an alpha8 colorspace and
> COMPOSITE_OVER to paint on selections, I'm not sure I understand why this
> would not work in 2.x. I definitely don't believe we need to double the
> memory
> requirements of selections to be able to paint on them: I think using a
> different composite op should be enough.
>

How are you intending to describe the shape of the brush without a separate
alpha channel?


-- 
Dmitry Kazakov

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px \
solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">It used to \
work just fine in 1.6, where we used an alpha8 colorspace and<br>

COMPOSITE_OVER to paint on selections, I&#39;m not sure I understand why this<br>
would not work in 2.x. I definitely don&#39;t believe we need to double the \
memory<br> requirements of selections to be able to paint on them: I think using \
a<br> different composite op should be enough.<font color="#888888"><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>How are you intending to describe the shape of the \
brush without a separate alpha channel?<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dmitry \
Kazakov<br>



_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]