--===============1082117918== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c88574ba230472bf0409 --00504502c88574ba230472bf0409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thursday 03 September 2009, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Boudewijn Rempt > wrote: > > > On Thursday 03 September 2009, Dmitry Kazakov wrote: > > > > We can easily change this behavior - a thumbnail of ANY layer will > show > > > > > > the > > > > > > > resulting projection with all the masks applied. This won't be quite > > > > logical, but there is no barrier in implementation. > > > > > > Actually, that's the way I wanted it all the time, just like with group > > > layers: a thumbnail shows the rendered projection of a layer > > > > This doesn't make sense for me. The thumbnail would change even if the > > content of the layer doesn't change, > > It might also confuse users coming from the other editors. > > But the masks are part of the content of a layer, just like the layers in a > group are part of the group layer -- so it makes sense to use the rendered > projection in the thumbnail for a layer. > > > What's wrong with adjustment layer + group layer? Ok it wastes some > space, > > but it's not like we are really saving space in the layerbox anyway. > > I must be missing something here? > This (show in the image on the right side): > >Example: > > http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/5144/adjustmentlayer2.png > > > With filter mask it starts with the paint layer, jumps to the lowest > child > > of the layer and goes upwards while compositing (With explicit masks > > would even be one level deeper)What's also weird is that the preview > > image of the finished layer would be shown in the first child of the > source layer (last filter mask). > > I don't like the second way as it takes tooooo much space on your > workplace. > > Idea! What if we'll introduce a tree with the root in the bottom and > branches at the top? =) > > Like this: > > --o Layer3 > --o Layer2 > > + Second mask > | > + First mask > | > --+ Layer1 > --o Layer0 > > What do you think? > --00504502c88574ba230472bf0409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Boudewijn Rempt= <boud@valdyas.org= > wrote:
On Thursday 03 September 2009, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <boud@valdyas.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 September 2009, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
> > > We can easily change this behavior - a thumbnail of ANY laye= r will show
> >
> > the
> >
> > > resulting projection with all the masks applied. This won= 9;t be quite
> > > logical, but there is no barrier in implementation.
> >
> > Actually, that's the way I wanted it all the time, just like = with group
> > layers: a thumbnail shows the rendered projection of a layer
>
> This doesn't make sense for me. The thumbnail would change even if= the
> content of the layer doesn't change,
> It might also confuse users coming from the other editors.

But the masks are part of the content of a layer, just like the layer= s in a
group are part of the group layer -- so it makes sense to use the rendered<= br> projection in the thumbnail for a layer.

> What's wrong with adjustment layer + group layer? Ok it wastes som= e space,
> but it's not like we are really saving space in the layerbox anywa= y.

I must be missing something here?

=A0This (s= how in the image on the right side):
>Example:
> http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/51= 44/adjustmentlayer2.png

> With filter mask it starts with the= paint layer, jumps to the lowest child
> of the layer and goes upwards while compositing (With explicit masks
> would even be one level deeper)What's also weird= is that the preview
> image of the finished layer would be shown in the first child of the source layer (last filter mask).

I don't like= the second way as it takes tooooo much space on your workplace.

Ide= a! What if we'll introduce a tree with the root in the bottom and branc= hes at the top? =3D)

Like this:

-= -o Layer3
--o= Layer2

=A0 + Second mask
=A0 |
=A0 + First mask
=A0 |
--+ Layer1
--o Layer0
What do you think?

--00504502c88574ba230472bf0409-- --===============1082117918== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ kimageshop mailing list kimageshop@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop --===============1082117918==--