On Thursday 18 September 2008, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Right. To clarify, I meant that we'd either keep the existing dialog and
> use it as a "wizard" to create additional filters doing the same
> operations that are currently "baked", or else we would indeed only
> create debayer + wb. Either would be OK with me, though I lean a bit
> toward "wizard" mode.

<rant>
Considering how much I dislike that dialog, and how much I am unhappy about 
all the breakage in libkdcraw "stable" version. I had rather send the dialog 
and the library to the trash :)
</rant>

Well I think what would be cool is have such wizards as a script so that would 
apply to all kind of images and not just raw files.

> Ok, I guess libkdcraw needs work then :-). (Ah... *dcraw* can provide
> the raw, pre-bayer data, right? 
Nope.

> And libkdcraw is a dcraw wrapper, yes?) 
The good thing is that libkdcraw is using libraw now, and libraw can do it. I 
am seriously considering moving to libraw for 2.1.

-- 
Cyrille Berger
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop