On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Cyrille Berger wrote:

> I fully agree on that. I don't think it's needed. It's mostly a marketing 
> problem, users don't care if the developement happens in the same svn or not.
> 
> An other solution is to presplit the tarball ourself :
> - KDE Office Library
> - KDE Office Productivity (roughly the equivalent of MSO, OOo, iWorks)
> - KDE Office Creativity (Karbon14 + Krita)
> 
> Or replace Office with a better keyword. I think that keeping a common name 
> other than KDE is good branding practise to indicate that if you use both 
> suits together you get an improved user experience. After all it's the key 
> idea behind Adobe's Creative Suit, even if each applications is sold 
> together.

Hey! If Adobe is merely adobe -- we can be bricks! As in "you're a brick,
Angela!"

(/me is in a silly mood from having read to much John Donne)

_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop