[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Move to graphicsmagick
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2006-05-25 14:08:28
Message-ID: 200605251608.28932.boud () valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Thursday 25 May 2006 16:00, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > The only reason I haven't done so was because I thought graphicsmagick
> > wasn't packaged by distributions. If it is, or if we have enough clout to
> > get it packaged, I think we should do it like greased lightning.
> >From irc:
>
> 12:02 < isaac> 12:00 < Riddell> developers shouldn't not use something
> because it's not packaged, if a program needs it people will package it
> unless there's some obvious problem with it
>
> and I got flame for telling that there might be a problem, anyway, we
> might, for the moment, keep the imagemagick and mark it as deprecated, and
> have the graphicsmagick be activated over imagemagick if it is available
> and have a configure message to warn the user that imagemagick is
> deprecated and won't be maintained in the future.

Good. Feel free to take action :-) (But don't forget the new cmyk saving bug, 
that's a biggie for 1.5.2)

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt 
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]