[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: koffice/krita/core/tiles
From:       Adrian Page <adrian () pagenet ! plus ! com>
Date:       2005-03-27 14:08:17
Message-ID: 4246BE51.9020103 () pagenet ! plus ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Casper Boemann wrote:
>>A quick tip: you could use QValueVector<struct DeletedTile> here, which
>>would mean you wouldn't need to write all the linked list manipulation
>>code. The Qt collection classes save you time and are less prone to bugs
>>- worth considering in the future.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> didn't think of that because I don't like to have qt this deep into krita, but 
> I guess you're right.

I would use it no matter how deep it is, since it does lead to simpler, 
more reliable and maintainable code. If there are concerns about 
performance, that would be tackled after profiling and homing in on what 
would need more specialised code.

Adrian
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic