On October 24, 2003 08:56 am, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Patrick Julien wrote:
> > Yes, they do, and littlecms is already a dependency of krita, even if it
> > is an indirect one.
>
> Oh, good -- that means both that I already should have it, and that I can
> use it when necessary. Perhaps it would be even better if KoColor would
> proxy for LittleCMS, but I'm first going to take a look at their docs.

If you go down that route, I personally, did not care since I knew that the 
planned architecture allowed for this to be added at a later time with 
minimal effort.

>
> Not that I want to spend all the time I have on adding a colour model I
> have no use for personally -- it's more important, at the moment, that
> there is more than one, so I (and anybody else) is forced to take that
> flexibility into account.

Speaking of which, you forgot about upscale/downscale, this strategy is no 
longer color channel depth independent.

>
> I'll probably check the preliminary version in tonight; this weekend is
> unfortunately booked full already with guests.

Having a life outside of computers is not unfortunate :)
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop