--===============1292981192==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-Mnm1S/VnIVa9l3PrcwP9"


--=-Mnm1S/VnIVa9l3PrcwP9
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 09:15, Richard Dale wrote:
> I can't see any need to use the JDK - maybe better debugging than via gdb=
=20
> perhaps I don't know. I don't think there's any real need to compile kde =
apps=20
> with gcj to native code, they run just fine interpreted with gij I would =
say.

Actually compiling java source files to native binaries/libraries makes
debugging much easier with gdb (especially if you are used to debugging
with gdb). When your code "hits" JNI/C or CNI/C++ code you just continue
to step through it. That is a really nice advantage of using the GNU
Compiler Collection (GCC) languages together with gdb it doesn't matter
which language your code is actually written in the debugger will grok
it.

> I'm not sure how well Konqueror works with java plugins, it might be poss=
ible=20
> to switch to gij for those - I read about a project to build a Netscape=20
> plugin for gij somewhere.

http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/gcjwebplugin
http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/no_free_java_plugin_for_mozilla.html

Cheers,

Mark

--=-Mnm1S/VnIVa9l3PrcwP9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAf6cgxVhZCJWr9QwRAjM8AJ9sYQOd2ILsRTHrr2Vitn/90D4JOACgl5lB
HS/mKURMV8LUby/DBgBau9U=
=taGR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Mnm1S/VnIVa9l3PrcwP9--


--===============1292981192==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Kde-java mailing list
Kde-java@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-java

--===============1292981192==--