[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-imaging
Subject:    Re: [Kde-imaging] Proposal for a possible future
From:       Vardhman Jain <vardhman () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-02-01 9:32:59
Message-ID: a5f47ac00602010120x1700a1c5h () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On 01/02/06, Joern Ahrens <joern.ahrens@kdemail.net> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 01:15, Aurelien Gateau wrote:
>
> Actually there aren't 18 plugins to manage, most of them just work or are
> so
> little they don't need additional work. Additionally I suggest the
> creators
> of the plugins have to keep track of their work too, which means if
> someone
> has added a plugin he is also responsible for it (so I will keep track of
> my
> last plugin and Varhman has to track flickrexport). If that doesn't work
> and
> a plugin makes too many problems, we have to decide if it will be removed
> from kipi (and maybe move to kde-playground).
>
> > - galleryexport : I would be interessted in adding the 2.0 support
> > - simpleviewerexport  : Joern, there are still some improvements planne=
d
>
> tracking bko has to be a job for everyone, until we have found somebody
> who
> will manage it. If there are easy to solve reports we should add JJ: to
> mark
> them as junior jobs, maybe Sebastian is interessted in solving them.
>
> > - mpegencoder : There are lots of reports.
> > - flickrexport : Vardhman ??
> > - imagesgallery : needs to be rewritten
>
> I am fine with maintaining the plugin. I decided earlier that I would
rather add features when they are requested in the wishlist and patch the
bugs which come around the BKO but didn't get much feedback/errors/feature
request, I was wondering if the plugin was even useful and used by anyone
!!!

So basically whatever is decided is fine with me. I will maintain the plugi=
n
whether it remains a kipi-plugin or it becomes digikam only plugin. I only
get libkipi gets better and I can increase my plugins functionality in the
first case. I haven't even tried it with Gwenview or showimg, So I have no
idea how useful it is for those apps, maybe some one else can tell.

regards,
Vardhman
--
Blogs: http://vardhman.blogspot.com

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 01/02/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Joern \
Ahrens</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:joern.ahrens@kdemail.net">joern.ahrens@kdemail.net</a>&gt; \
wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, \
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Wednesday 01 February \
2006 01:15, Aurelien Gateau wrote:<br><br>Actually there aren't 18 plugins to manage, \
most of them just work or are so<br>little they don't need additional work. \
Additionally I suggest the creators <br>of the plugins have to keep track of their \
work too, which means if someone<br>has added a plugin he is also responsible for it \
(so I will keep track of my<br>last plugin and Varhman has to track flickrexport). If \
that doesn't work and <br>a plugin makes too many problems, we have to decide if it \
will be removed<br>from kipi (and maybe move to kde-playground).<br><br>&gt; - \
galleryexport : I would be interessted in adding the 2.0 support<br>&gt; - \
simpleviewerexport&nbsp;&nbsp;: Joern, there are still some improvements planned \
<br><br>tracking bko has to be a job for everyone, until we have found somebody \
who<br>will manage it. If there are easy to solve reports we should add JJ: to \
mark<br>them as junior jobs, maybe Sebastian is interessted in solving them. \
<br><br>&gt; - mpegencoder : There are lots of reports.<br>&gt; - flickrexport : \
Vardhman ??<br>&gt; - imagesgallery : needs to be \
rewritten<br><br></blockquote></div>I am fine with maintaining the plugin. I decided \
earlier that I would rather add features when they are requested in the wishlist and \
patch the bugs which come around the BKO but didn't get much
feedback/errors/feature request, I was wondering if the plugin was even
useful and used by anyone !!! <br>
<br>
So basically whatever is decided is fine with me. I will maintain the
plugin whether it remains a kipi-plugin or it becomes digikam only
plugin. I only get libkipi gets better and I can increase my plugins
functionality in the first case. I haven't even tried it with Gwenview
or showimg, So I have no idea how useful it is for those apps, maybe
some one else can tell.<br>
<br>
regards,<br>
Vardhman<br>-- <br>Blogs: <a \
href="http://vardhman.blogspot.com">http://vardhman.blogspot.com</a><br>



_______________________________________________
Kde-imaging mailing list
Kde-imaging@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-imaging


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]