--- Renchi Raju <renchi@pooh.tam.uiuc.edu> wrote:

> 
> its time we thought about a libkipi release. libkipi
> library is itself
> stable (no known bugs currently), bc ready and
> feature complete (for now).
> digikam and kimbdaba depend directly on libkipi and
> the delay in release
> of libkipi is going to further delay any releases
> from our side.
> 
> now, there is the issue of when kipi-plugins should
> be released. some of
> the plugins have show-stopper bugs against them. so
> we have a bunch of
> options:
> a) release libkipi and kipi-plugins now, as is, with
> the bugs to be
> handled later
> b) release libkipi now and the kipi-plugins later
> (when the bugs are
> fixed).
> c) wait till all show-stopper bugs are fixed in
> kipi-plugins before
> releasing libkipi and kipi-plugins together.
> 
> please vote for these options or any additional ones
> you might suggest.
> 
> i register my vote for option (b).
> 
> renchi

Hi,
as far as i'm concerned kipi-plugins are already 
released on mandrake contrib with gwenview. So 
i can understand blocking problems, but from my
point of view i prefer building also kipi-plugins
pckage instead libkipi alone.
So my vote is for (a).

Regards,
   Angelo


		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Kde-imaging mailing list
Kde-imaging@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-imaging